![]() |
European Forum for Hospital Sterile Supply |
EFHSS Education
Recommendations by the Quality Task Group |
Recommendations | AK "Qualität" |
---|---|---|
with kind permission of mhp-Verlag GmbH |
||
[3] Validation1 (Part 1)Based on DIN EN 554, validation is "a documented procedure for furnishing, recording and interpreting the requisite results, in order to demonstrate that a process continually meets the given specifications". Expressed in simple terms this means: validation is a complicated procedure during which a process is investigated to establish whether it is continually executed, i.e. also after validation, such that it meets all the The purpose of validation is explained as follows in draft DIN 58946-6 of April 1998: "Validation serves to furnish documented proof of the ongoing effectiveness of the sterilisation process under the operating conditions prevailing at the installation site, using the sterile items encountered in routine operation in their respective packaging and with the reference loads used". In principle all processes should be validated, in cases where each product produced by the process cannot be checked for compliance with the quality requirements (i.e. sterility in this case), as such a test would render it unusable (i.e. unsterile). Therefore Processes upon whose safe execution the health of people depends, hence also sterilisation of medicinal products, must be validated at regular intervals. In the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry validation has been an established practice for a long time now.
This definition will in the future apply to almost all the sterile supplies processed in the CSSD. Furthermore, the steriliser itself is also classified as a medical device and must be operated in accordance with MPG and MPBetrreibV. The Since an ordinance has a legal character, a different procedure is adopted from that described for cases of violation of a law, and a sentence will be passed by judges if this violation would endanger the safety and health of patients. A process which is to be validated must demonstrate proof that it is always executed in the same manner within defined limits. Validation must have a basis, e.g. a standard. Processes to be validated should be (fully) automatic. Processes that are not reproducible, i.e. run differently in each case and thus unpredictably, cannot be validated. Processes that do not comply with the requirements specified in the standards governing them cannot be validated on the basis of these standards. Validation can be carried out by anyone who possesses the necessary expertise and reliability, meets the prerequisites and disposes of appropriate means and calibrated measuring equipment for proper execution of validation. Validation confers a whole range of advantages:
If conditions have remained unchanged, thermoelectric testing of the sterilisation process should be conducted once yearly with previously calibrated sensors. If conditions have changed, a performance assessment must be carried out again even before one year has elapsed. 1 This articles focuses in particular on the general principles of validation. In the next edition of Central Service the individual steps needed to implement validation will be outlined based on the example of a case. |
What is validation?
What should, what must be validated?
Must the sterilisation processes used in a hospital be validated?
Subject to what conditions is a process validable? Who may conduct validation of steam sterilisation processes? What advantages does validation confer compared to the hitherto customary checking of sterilisers? |
![]() |
European Forum for Hospital Sterile Supply |
Developed by Baumeister Mediasoft Engineering