EFHSS - European Forum for Hospital Sterile Supply :: Questions & Answers EFHSS Questions and Answers - Question Q00117 - English Version
  <<>>

EFHSS Questions and Answers - Question Q00117

Categories Authors Questions Unanswered Questions Questions with Answers Questions and Answers Submit New Question Help

Category Sort By Sort Order
View

EFHSS - Questions & Answers - Sterile Storage - Q00117
Clean unopen expired
Follow Up
Web Search
From:    Date: 25 December 2001, 18:25 [GMT]
Subject: Clean unopen expired

Subject: Clean unopen expired

Is there any regulation or Standard not to use. expired item, good in material? or the item is still sterile and safe. Items stored in controll area. Thanks if any one can help me.

From:    Date: 28 December 2001, 14:34 [GMT]
Subject: Re: Clean unopen expired

Good day Samad,
The person or company who placed the original expiration date on the item no longer certifies the expired item is safe for patient use. If you use an item after the expiration date, you are giving the item a new expiration date. When you place a new expiration date on an item, you must provide the guarantee that the item is safe for patient use. You have correctly identified the two factors affecting shelf life that you must consider before you can guarantee the item is safe for patient use. The sterility maintenance of the items does not appear to be a problem because the items have been stored in a controlled environment. The second factor, the material is still good, is more likely to be a problem according to my experience. Items made from natural sources will naturally degrade over time. Examples include any items with latex such as gloves and syringe plungers; some kinds of sutures break down, etc. They slowly lose elasticity and there is a chance that they might fail (break) catastrophically. Plasticizers that give plastic items their unique qualities evaporate from plastic over time, changing the character of the plastic so the item has different qualities in use. It might become less flexible, or shatter in use. Almost all items manufactured commercially over the last decade have a label that says the item is sterile unless the packaging is compromised, except when then item inside degrades over time. The manufacturer that placed the expiration date on the item is often your best resource for learning why they put an expiration date on the item. They may be willing to share the studies they used in deciding to put an expiration date on the item, or if they are very generous, they may even exchange the outdated stock with fresh stock. The decision to extend an expiration date is not an "All or Nothing" decision; it must be done on a case-by-case basis after a study of the storage conditions and the material stored. I would also suggest getting the approval of the Risk Management department in your hospital before implementing a decision to extend an expiration date. When the rules changed allowing manufacturers to label items as "Sterile until package is compromised", this type of decision for the old, expiration-dated stock was common. Today, there is almost always a problem with material degradation with medical supplies that have an expiration date.
On an editorial note, I wonder why the items are outdating. Proper rotation of stock is an inventory control issue that may need to be addressed. The items maintained in storage are not used? Then why pay for storage space and maintenance of the items when space is always in short supply?
Regards, Pete

From: Wim Renders (Belgium)   Date: 27 January 2002, 17:55 [GMT]
Subject: Re: Clean unopen expired

Dear,
I totally agree with Pete. I just want to make a comment on the regulatory aspect.
For the European community the medical device directive (MDD) 93/42/EEC obliges the manufacturer to put the peremption date on every sterile medical device (Annex 1, Essential requirements 1, 13 3). If there is no peremption date on the package, the product may not be sold nor be brought on the market. This is the responsability of the manufacturer who also must have a liability insurance (Art. 9 par. 8).
Art. 2 of the MDD says that the member states have to take all the necessary measures to ensure that the medical devices are only brought on the market and used if they do not endanger the safety and the health of the patient when they are correctly placed, maintained and used in conformity with their destination.
This has as a consequence that the responsable for the distribution of the sterile medical devices in, for example a hospital (In Belgium the pharmacist), is responsable for the medical devices he delivers and their conformity with the MDD (Art. 10 par. 9). So this responsable may not sell nor use perempted products.
In case of problems caused by the use of a perempted product the productliability of the manufacturer is left out or is at least questionable.
The responsable for the distribution can be held responsable with possible serious legal conseqences.
Kind regards,
Wim Renders

Please use the Follow Up form if you want to post a reply or answer to question Q00117. For new questions please use the Submit New Question form.

  ^<>>
EFHSS - European Forum for Hospital Sterile Supply :: Questions & Answers EFHSS Questions and Answers - Question Q00117 - English Version

© 2005 EFHSS " Updated: 21 April 2005, 10:27 [GMT]