![]() |
European Forum for Hospital Sterile Supply |
Categories Authors Questions Unanswered Questions Questions with Answers Questions and Answers Submit New Question Help
View |
Please fill out the following form and submit it to post a reply and/or answer to question Q00234 to the EFHSS Questions and Answers pages. For new questions please use the Submit New Question form instead.
Please contact/notify if you have any questions and/or problems using the EFHSS Questions and Answers pages.
|
||
From:
(Canada) Date: 20 January 2003, 02:27 [GMT] Subject: Wet Load |
||
Hello Fellow Workers, |
From:
(Netherlands) Date: 22 January 2003, 11:20 [GMT] Subject: Re: Wet Load |
Hello Barb,
Do not think you are the only one with this problem because I believe the "wet load problem" is the most common problem at all CSSD's worldwide. If the problem is new than it is important to trace changes in all the procedures from the date the problem occurred. This is often very helpful to eliminate a few possible causes. |
From: Dan Mayworm Date: 25 January 2003, 06:51 [GMT] Subject: Re: Wet Load |
My answer to this question would depend upon the extent of the "wetness". If the problem is that one of the packs was not set up properly, i.e., too much metal, too heavy, too dense, etc. and it is the only wet pack, then there is no need to pull the full load. However, if most of the packs in the load show water damage, have beads of water on their surfaces, etc. then this indicates a problem with the steam supply and the full load should be pulled and the supply problem solved. |
![]() |
European Forum for Hospital Sterile Supply |
Developed by Baumeister Mediasoft Engineering