Hi Derek,
I'll begin with a quote from the 19th century:
"The writer would be distinctly understood as not recommending formaldehyde even when combined with a high degree of heat, as a disinfecting agent upon which reliance can always be placed for the treatment of articles requiring penetration, especially when the exposure is limited to ½ hour. A critical examination of nearly all published experiments with this agent will reveal instances in which the organisms that there was every reason to expect would be killed have survived, and vice versa. It is that occasional unaccountable uncertainty of action that calls forth the warning not to attempt disinfection with formaldehyde"
E.K. Sprague, U.S. Marine Hospital Service, over 100 years ago, 1899.
An aqueous solution of 8% formaldehyde and 70% isopropyl alcohol is a rapid bactercide and tuberculocide.
Formaldehyde has exposure limits: eight hour time weighted average (TWA) of 1 part per million (ppm) and a fifteen-minute short term exposure limit (STEL) of 2 ppm. (Stricter than EtO!) The employer must institute controls to maintain employee exposure below these limits. To fumigate a room will require the person wear a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) with a positive pressure full face mask and the fumes must leave the room through a dedicated exhaust and not enter other parts of the building. As a minimum, specific health hazards the employer must address are: Cancer, irritation and sensitization of the skin and respiratory system, eye and throat irritation, and formaldehyde's acute toxicity.
These folks need to come up with an alternate plan. Not knowing the specifics of the situation there, the materials being disinfected, and what organisms they are attempting to kill, it is hard to make a specific recommendation.
Regards, Pete Bobb BSc, ACE
|